The Duffy Affair: Ethics commissioner points to limitations in probe

Julian Wolfe
May 26th, 2013

Ethics commissioner Mary Dawson is telling Canadians her probe will be limited as she readies a third look at former chief of staff Nigel Wright who is involved in a potential conflict of interest when he gave then-Conservative senator Mike Duffy $90,172 to pay off inappropriate housing allowance claims.

Dawson stressed on Friday that her investigation would look at the Conflict of Interest act, not whether their conduct was questionable.

“We do have to find ourselves within the four corners of the Act and the code because it’s not fair to the person being complained against just to not be aware what they were accused of,” Dawson said Friday.

“Reputations are important so we take a fair bit of care to make sure we are not falsely concluding anything.”

Dawson said her office can’t police ethical matters.

“Political activities are not particularly covered by either the act or the code,” she said in the interview.

“It’s important that people realize that maybe there is a lack there. Maybe it’s not necessarily for this office to be looking after, but there should be some rules governing political behaviour.”

Upon her third look at Wright, Dawson said her office will release a report covering the whole story.

“I think when we issue any report it’s a fulsome report,” she said. “We try to get to the bottom of the whole situation.”

Meanwhile, a group called Democracy Watch believes the ethics commissioner doesn’t release full reports.

“The Conservatives caused the Senate scandal, but they and the Liberals, NDP and Bloc Quebecois are all to blame for the weak, biased or ineffective lapdogs who are investigating the scandal,” said Tyler Sommers, co-ordinator of Democracy Watch, in a statement earlier last week.

“Because they all failed during recent minority governments to choose strong watchdogs, and to pass measures to close loopholes and strengthen enforcement powers and requirements.”

Both Dawson’s office and Democracy Watch have asked for more powers for the ethics office, one a House of Commons committee reviewed but never released a report.

The government has claimed the ethics commission as its way of dealing with the scandal but given its limitations show it will lead to no real results. Do you have confidence in Dawson’s probe into the Duffy affair?

Read more posts like this one.

   Categories: Accountability, Integrity, Political Interference, The Duffy Affair


On Monday, the longest campaign in modern history will come to a close and if current polls are any indication, Canada may be seeing a change in government after 9 years of Conservative rule under the leadership of Stephen Harper. Accountability was his calling card in 2006 and today, accountability may very well be one of the defining reasons for his departure.

In its length, in its cost and in its debate schedule, this election is unusual. The first and possibly only real debate of the campaign ended and here are the highlights of what happened.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper left Rideau Hall this morning with Governor General David Johnston’s approval to drop the writ and Canadians are now officially headed to the polls on October 19. For the first time since fixed election date legislation was brought in by the Conservative government, a fixed election date has been followed.

Join the discussion!

Share this article with your friends!

What do you think? Leave a comment!